<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/</link>
	<description>Daily photo-journal of organic market gardening: growing local food with two acres and some tools...!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike (tfb)</title>
		<link>http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-2825</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike (tfb)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-2825</guid>
		<description>Hi Heather: It sounds like you have a compact, shipshape tiny farm, with future planning in order! :) About tractor gear, having started literally on an acre by hand (although it was moldboarded, disked and rototilled by a big tractor to start), I find it kinda hard to think of switching tasks from hand to tractors. This year, for the first time, I hired full-time, and there was also a great crew of part-timers. Maybe I was lucky with people, and next year will be a problem, but I quite like the people power approach. I do use a small tractor for lots of stuff, including rototilling, but I could always get by with the Horse walking rototiller and...help, if there was an emergency where the tractor went down. Bob here on the farm keeps suggesting longer rows and getting an old cultivating tractor, and I'd like to get the machine to experiment with, but the long rows and riding up and down cultivating isn't as appealing. I guess I haven't sorted this part out, but for now, I still see people at work and a max 5 acres in production. Thinking too small?

I posted a longer bit on &lt;a href="http://tinyfarmblog.com/forum/topic.php?id=7&#038;replies=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;people-vs-tractor &lt;/a&gt; on the forum I attached to this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Heather: It sounds like you have a compact, shipshape tiny farm, with future planning in order! :) About tractor gear, having started literally on an acre by hand (although it was moldboarded, disked and rototilled by a big tractor to start), I find it kinda hard to think of switching tasks from hand to tractors. This year, for the first time, I hired full-time, and there was also a great crew of part-timers. Maybe I was lucky with people, and next year will be a problem, but I quite like the people power approach. I do use a small tractor for lots of stuff, including rototilling, but I could always get by with the Horse walking rototiller and&#8230;help, if there was an emergency where the tractor went down. Bob here on the farm keeps suggesting longer rows and getting an old cultivating tractor, and I&#8217;d like to get the machine to experiment with, but the long rows and riding up and down cultivating isn&#8217;t as appealing. I guess I haven&#8217;t sorted this part out, but for now, I still see people at work and a max 5 acres in production. Thinking too small?</p>
<p>I posted a longer bit on <a href="http://tinyfarmblog.com/forum/topic.php?id=7&#038;replies=1" rel="nofollow">people-vs-tractor </a> on the forum I attached to this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-2798</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-2798</guid>
		<description>I agree!  Small is the key to being successful...  My husband and I run a small CSA.  Just 20 members this year ($8000) on 3/4 acre = about $.30 a sq ft.  We want grow in the next 5 years to do 100 members and that will handelly support our family.  Although unlike Elliot Coleman, I like more machines!  Mechanical transplanter (waterwheel), plastic mulch layer, tractor tiller, decent used tractor, &#38; others will raise my equipment cost to about $20,000 to $25,000, but it is worth every penny in my mind, just be sure you can buy stuff in cash and not carry any debt!  Less debt = less risk!  Less risk = continue farming...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree!  Small is the key to being successful&#8230;  My husband and I run a small CSA.  Just 20 members this year ($8000) on 3/4 acre = about $.30 a sq ft.  We want grow in the next 5 years to do 100 members and that will handelly support our family.  Although unlike Elliot Coleman, I like more machines!  Mechanical transplanter (waterwheel), plastic mulch layer, tractor tiller, decent used tractor, &amp; others will raise my equipment cost to about $20,000 to $25,000, but it is worth every penny in my mind, just be sure you can buy stuff in cash and not carry any debt!  Less debt = less risk!  Less risk = continue farming&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>Good stuff Mike...  Thanks for sharing!
Peace
Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff Mike&#8230;  Thanks for sharing!<br />
Peace<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike (tfb)</title>
		<link>http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1727</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike (tfb)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1727</guid>
		<description>So far, I kinda like the idea of celebrity farmers, it's sort of...hilarious! Salatin is the only "crossover" name I'd recognize, I dunno how much mainstream media exposure he's gotten, but I have read about him a lot in the last year or so. Someone like Eliot Coleman is definitely a celebrity farmer in organic farming circles, but I doubt anyone else knows his name. There are some writers, like Michael Pollan (&lt;i&gt;Omnivore's Dilemma&lt;/i&gt;) who are likely more widely known, than, say, Coleman—for now, I'd rather have a celebrity farmer than a celebrity farming writer! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, I kinda like the idea of celebrity farmers, it&#8217;s sort of&#8230;hilarious! Salatin is the only &#8220;crossover&#8221; name I&#8217;d recognize, I dunno how much mainstream media exposure he&#8217;s gotten, but I have read about him a lot in the last year or so. Someone like Eliot Coleman is definitely a celebrity farmer in organic farming circles, but I doubt anyone else knows his name. There are some writers, like Michael Pollan (<i>Omnivore&#8217;s Dilemma</i>) who are likely more widely known, than, say, Coleman—for now, I&#8217;d rather have a celebrity farmer than a celebrity farming writer! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Huntley</title>
		<link>http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1701</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Huntley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1701</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I have to admit that it is a little hard to take the advice of "celebrity farmers" extremely seriously since they make so much money with speaking and other types of income. I think they have a lot to give the community, but what is really inspiring is to look around and lower-profile local farmers who are economically successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I have to admit that it is a little hard to take the advice of &#8220;celebrity farmers&#8221; extremely seriously since they make so much money with speaking and other types of income. I think they have a lot to give the community, but what is really inspiring is to look around and lower-profile local farmers who are economically successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1685</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1685</guid>
		<description>This has been very enlightening.  Thanks for all the advice and information.

I guess the best I can do is to offer a bit in return, which is: listen to Coleman.  I study economic and organizational sociology, and the number one way to throw away a great enterprise is to ignore the relationship between its size and its success.  Like Coleman says, if you ask anybody to list the most successful businesses, they all list the big ones.  Okay, no ranting, I promise...

Interestingly enough, look who popped up in Business Week this week: &lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/aug2007/sb2007088_984272.htm?chan=smallbiz_smallbiz+index+page_success+stories" rel="nofollow"&gt;A New Push to Make Farming Profitable&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been very enlightening.  Thanks for all the advice and information.</p>
<p>I guess the best I can do is to offer a bit in return, which is: listen to Coleman.  I study economic and organizational sociology, and the number one way to throw away a great enterprise is to ignore the relationship between its size and its success.  Like Coleman says, if you ask anybody to list the most successful businesses, they all list the big ones.  Okay, no ranting, I promise&#8230;</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, look who popped up in Business Week this week: <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/aug2007/sb2007088_984272.htm?chan=smallbiz_smallbiz+index+page_success+stories" rel="nofollow">A New Push to Make Farming Profitable</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike (tfb)</title>
		<link>http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1676</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike (tfb)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1676</guid>
		<description>This is a fun discussion! ;) 

I think small farming requires EQUAL emphasis on BOTH "small" and "farming". Tiny farming doesn't really scale well, and that I think is the critical consideration, maybe the Secret. With small farming, your "job" is fulfilling and fun, it's an end in itself. The bigger you get, the less personal it becomes, your quality of involvement and your baseline enjoyment reduce, and the money aspect becomes inversely more important. 

Interesting American organic farmer/educator Eliot Coleman has a required reading book, &lt;i&gt;The New Organic Grower: A Master's Manual of Tools and Techniques for the Home and Market Gardener&lt;/i&gt;. It's around 340 pages. The Marketing chapter is quite complete and takes up all of six pages, which seems like a crazy ratio for the entire sales/revenue side of tiny farming, but when you're actually doing it, you realize that it's easy to over-emphasize the "business" aspect. If you concentrate on quality and consistency in the field, the commerce seems to naturally follow!

Coleman's final section in the six pages on Marketing is worth reproducing (I trust he'd grant permission!): 

&lt;i&gt;Stay Small

These days, when a business succeeds there is always the tendency to multiply the success by getting bigger. I have one word of adviceâ€”don't. That admonition may sound heretical given the dictates of modern economics, but my experience confirms it. I have seen too many successful producers make the expansion mistake. Without exception, they have each become just another company trading on the reputation they established before expanding. If demand exceeds supply, bring the two back into line by raising prices. Income will increase just as it would by expansion, but quality will not be compromised.&lt;/i&gt;

It's easy to explore the economics more in-depth. Take two acres in full production as an end target example. Check the &lt;a href="http://tinyfarmblog.com/?page_id=550&#038;preview=true" rel="nofollow"&gt;equipment requirements&lt;/a&gt; chartâ€”you can acquire the entire list for under $10,000, old truck included. From there, it's all labor, creativity, maintaining good karma, more labor... If you start at 50 cents a square foot on 35,000 sq ft out of each acre, that's a gross revenue of $35K. Try going down to 25 cents ($17.5K), and up to a buck ($70K). Work the crop selection, the weeks of availability, and so forth. If you grow 20 crops and have a short season of only 20 weeks, you need to sell $87.50 of each crop each week to hit the 50-cent target. Break that down and work the variables. Add weeks to the season, adjust for higher and lower priced crops, etc, etc. $87.50 is 58 bunches of radishes at $1.50/bu, or 22 400g bags of salad mix at $4, over 20 weeks. What if you managed a 26 week season? What if you grew 10 or 30 crops? Convert all that back to the square feet and map it (a crude sketch would do to start!) to get a rough field production planâ€”how much to grow of each cropâ€”and don't forget succession planting, you can get a minimum of three salad crops of the same ground in one season, and so forth...) It's a straightforward, simple, totally fun arithmetic game!!

I think an attainable higher end goal over maybe 5-7 years is $80K/ac for 2-3 acres. You can start alone, with part-time help at critical times. To approach really full production, you'll need at least two full time workers (farmer plus hired hand), eventually probably three or four, plus a bunch of part-timers. And you'll find that it works out to serving maybe 200-500 regular weekly customers, whether by market, farm stand, CSA, or combination. For example, 3 ac x 80K/ac = $240K (around $2.30/sq ft at 35 sq ft/ac). Divide by 400 customers and that's $600 per season per customer. That's a doable rate for a 20wk CSA membership, or it works out over 20wks to $30/wk veggie spending per customer. That'd be enough veggies for 1-2 people, or a small family.

With those numbers, there seems to be room for LOTS of tiny farmers! And I drive by the land for hundreds (thousands) of tiny farms every time I make the 12 mile trip to the nearby town of 17,000. 

At the bottom line, where are you after a few short years? The optimist's view: you're in pretty good health from doing the work and eating the superfresh produce, the initial stress has evolved into a general calm and connected feeling: you're better educated, your lifestyle is a lot more sustainable, you've learned to roll with the elements, you have a truly meaningful connection with the people around you, you should be debt-free and operating essentially a cash business, with no financing worries, and you're pulling down maybe $50K a year, after all expenses (which includes immense, value-adding reinvestment each year in the soil, in your production system, in your gear). If you like doing this stuff (it's addictive!!!), you should be a pretty happy camper... And if our entire economic house of cards collapses, at least you'll be eating well till the bitter end. :)

This simplifies things a lot, but I don't think it's a...simplistic view, just a stripped down one. Paper planning is absolutely necessary, but getting distracted by the formal business plan approach as a starting point can obscure the most important reality, which is the passion, the motivation, the satisfaction, the quality of life, all driving well-focussed, well-intentioned effort on the part of the tiny farmer. It's not EASY, but it's also not that complicated.

Now, lemme re-read that! BTW, in my Year 5, I've got a long way to go, but it's moving along and totally fun! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fun discussion! ;) </p>
<p>I think small farming requires EQUAL emphasis on BOTH &#8220;small&#8221; and &#8220;farming&#8221;. Tiny farming doesn&#8217;t really scale well, and that I think is the critical consideration, maybe the Secret. With small farming, your &#8220;job&#8221; is fulfilling and fun, it&#8217;s an end in itself. The bigger you get, the less personal it becomes, your quality of involvement and your baseline enjoyment reduce, and the money aspect becomes inversely more important. </p>
<p>Interesting American organic farmer/educator Eliot Coleman has a required reading book, <i>The New Organic Grower: A Master&#8217;s Manual of Tools and Techniques for the Home and Market Gardener</i>. It&#8217;s around 340 pages. The Marketing chapter is quite complete and takes up all of six pages, which seems like a crazy ratio for the entire sales/revenue side of tiny farming, but when you&#8217;re actually doing it, you realize that it&#8217;s easy to over-emphasize the &#8220;business&#8221; aspect. If you concentrate on quality and consistency in the field, the commerce seems to naturally follow!</p>
<p>Coleman&#8217;s final section in the six pages on Marketing is worth reproducing (I trust he&#8217;d grant permission!): </p>
<p><i>Stay Small</p>
<p>These days, when a business succeeds there is always the tendency to multiply the success by getting bigger. I have one word of adviceâ€”don&#8217;t. That admonition may sound heretical given the dictates of modern economics, but my experience confirms it. I have seen too many successful producers make the expansion mistake. Without exception, they have each become just another company trading on the reputation they established before expanding. If demand exceeds supply, bring the two back into line by raising prices. Income will increase just as it would by expansion, but quality will not be compromised.</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to explore the economics more in-depth. Take two acres in full production as an end target example. Check the <a href="http://tinyfarmblog.com/?page_id=550&#038;preview=true" rel="nofollow">equipment requirements</a> chartâ€”you can acquire the entire list for under $10,000, old truck included. From there, it&#8217;s all labor, creativity, maintaining good karma, more labor&#8230; If you start at 50 cents a square foot on 35,000 sq ft out of each acre, that&#8217;s a gross revenue of $35K. Try going down to 25 cents ($17.5K), and up to a buck ($70K). Work the crop selection, the weeks of availability, and so forth. If you grow 20 crops and have a short season of only 20 weeks, you need to sell $87.50 of each crop each week to hit the 50-cent target. Break that down and work the variables. Add weeks to the season, adjust for higher and lower priced crops, etc, etc. $87.50 is 58 bunches of radishes at $1.50/bu, or 22 400g bags of salad mix at $4, over 20 weeks. What if you managed a 26 week season? What if you grew 10 or 30 crops? Convert all that back to the square feet and map it (a crude sketch would do to start!) to get a rough field production planâ€”how much to grow of each cropâ€”and don&#8217;t forget succession planting, you can get a minimum of three salad crops of the same ground in one season, and so forth&#8230;) It&#8217;s a straightforward, simple, totally fun arithmetic game!!</p>
<p>I think an attainable higher end goal over maybe 5-7 years is $80K/ac for 2-3 acres. You can start alone, with part-time help at critical times. To approach really full production, you&#8217;ll need at least two full time workers (farmer plus hired hand), eventually probably three or four, plus a bunch of part-timers. And you&#8217;ll find that it works out to serving maybe 200-500 regular weekly customers, whether by market, farm stand, CSA, or combination. For example, 3 ac x 80K/ac = $240K (around $2.30/sq ft at 35 sq ft/ac). Divide by 400 customers and that&#8217;s $600 per season per customer. That&#8217;s a doable rate for a 20wk CSA membership, or it works out over 20wks to $30/wk veggie spending per customer. That&#8217;d be enough veggies for 1-2 people, or a small family.</p>
<p>With those numbers, there seems to be room for LOTS of tiny farmers! And I drive by the land for hundreds (thousands) of tiny farms every time I make the 12 mile trip to the nearby town of 17,000. </p>
<p>At the bottom line, where are you after a few short years? The optimist&#8217;s view: you&#8217;re in pretty good health from doing the work and eating the superfresh produce, the initial stress has evolved into a general calm and connected feeling: you&#8217;re better educated, your lifestyle is a lot more sustainable, you&#8217;ve learned to roll with the elements, you have a truly meaningful connection with the people around you, you should be debt-free and operating essentially a cash business, with no financing worries, and you&#8217;re pulling down maybe $50K a year, after all expenses (which includes immense, value-adding reinvestment each year in the soil, in your production system, in your gear). If you like doing this stuff (it&#8217;s addictive!!!), you should be a pretty happy camper&#8230; And if our entire economic house of cards collapses, at least you&#8217;ll be eating well till the bitter end. :)</p>
<p>This simplifies things a lot, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a&#8230;simplistic view, just a stripped down one. Paper planning is absolutely necessary, but getting distracted by the formal business plan approach as a starting point can obscure the most important reality, which is the passion, the motivation, the satisfaction, the quality of life, all driving well-focussed, well-intentioned effort on the part of the tiny farmer. It&#8217;s not EASY, but it&#8217;s also not that complicated.</p>
<p>Now, lemme re-read that! BTW, in my Year 5, I&#8217;ve got a long way to go, but it&#8217;s moving along and totally fun! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Huntley</title>
		<link>http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1655</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Huntley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1655</guid>
		<description>You also have to consider the input per acre (equipment, labor) is much, much higher for a market farmer than for a soybean farmer. Most people farming these small acreages are also direct marketing their products which is an added cost both monetarily and in stress. Of course, not to say that it isn't more efficient in the long run than commodity farming -- just that there are tradeoffs.

Sorry to butt in on Mike, I'm sure he has a response too! By the way, great job with the blog Mike. Looking good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You also have to consider the input per acre (equipment, labor) is much, much higher for a market farmer than for a soybean farmer. Most people farming these small acreages are also direct marketing their products which is an added cost both monetarily and in stress. Of course, not to say that it isn&#8217;t more efficient in the long run than commodity farming &#8212; just that there are tradeoffs.</p>
<p>Sorry to butt in on Mike, I&#8217;m sure he has a response too! By the way, great job with the blog Mike. Looking good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1654</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1654</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the responses, Mike and Simon.  I'll have to look into those resources.  Mike, I thought your square foot example was pretty compelling by itself - and downright shocking when I compared it to some projected soybean revenues ($264 per acre).

In fact, the disparity was so huge that my brain couldn't handle it - it left me wondering how soybean farmers were getting $264 out of each square foot for about ten seconds before I realized that that was what they got from a whole acre.  You'd be getting less than a cent per square foot at that rate.  That a year's produce from a square foot of ground couldn't even earn a dollar in revenue is kind of mind-blowing, when you think about it from a gardening perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the responses, Mike and Simon.  I&#8217;ll have to look into those resources.  Mike, I thought your square foot example was pretty compelling by itself - and downright shocking when I compared it to some projected soybean revenues ($264 per acre).</p>
<p>In fact, the disparity was so huge that my brain couldn&#8217;t handle it - it left me wondering how soybean farmers were getting $264 out of each square foot for about ten seconds before I realized that that was what they got from a whole acre.  You&#8217;d be getting less than a cent per square foot at that rate.  That a year&#8217;s produce from a square foot of ground couldn&#8217;t even earn a dollar in revenue is kind of mind-blowing, when you think about it from a gardening perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike (tfb)</title>
		<link>http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike (tfb)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/08/24/oats/#comment-1652</guid>
		<description>Matt: I tried for a quick answer to basically the same question a while back. It's in my reply in the comments for &lt;a href="http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/06/17/the-hay-around-us/#comments" rel="nofollow"&gt;The hay around us&lt;/a&gt;. I just read it, seems to make sense, but I'll try to add to it...soon. 

On the gear/capital costs side, here's a really accurate and useful chart that'll give you an idea of &lt;a href="http://tinyfarmblog.com/?page_id=550&#038;preview=true" rel="nofollow"&gt;equipment requirements&lt;/a&gt;. It's taken from ATTRA's &lt;a href="http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/marketgardening.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;"Market Gardening: A Start-up Guide"&lt;/a&gt;, which is from my experience very practical, real-world, and on point. And online and BRIEF!

If you have more specific questions, that'd be easier! I'm happy to share my little bit of experience... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt: I tried for a quick answer to basically the same question a while back. It&#8217;s in my reply in the comments for <a href="http://tinyfarmblog.com/2007/06/17/the-hay-around-us/#comments" rel="nofollow">The hay around us</a>. I just read it, seems to make sense, but I&#8217;ll try to add to it&#8230;soon. </p>
<p>On the gear/capital costs side, here&#8217;s a really accurate and useful chart that&#8217;ll give you an idea of <a href="http://tinyfarmblog.com/?page_id=550&#038;preview=true" rel="nofollow">equipment requirements</a>. It&#8217;s taken from ATTRA&#8217;s <a href="http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/marketgardening.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Market Gardening: A Start-up Guide&#8221;</a>, which is from my experience very practical, real-world, and on point. And online and BRIEF!</p>
<p>If you have more specific questions, that&#8217;d be easier! I&#8217;m happy to share my little bit of experience&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
